I'm a youtuber and educator who loves to talk about Instrumentation and Control Engineering. Subscribe and join over 10,000+ newsletter readers every week!
Share
πHow I Perform Orifice Plate Sizing
Published 3 days agoΒ β’Β 7 min read
π " Three Times Better (Engineer) "
The 3 Things You will learn are as follows.
π One Engineering Question
π One Engineering Standard
π One Career Tip from Top Professionals
Before we start :
If you would like to access PDF of the "Instrumentation Engineers guide to Orifice Flowmeter Sizing"
then reply "Orifice Sizing PDF"
And I will send it to you.
#1 -Engineering Question
π "Hi Asad, β How do we perform Orifice Plate Sizing ? I am confused since there are multiple parameters - Is there a Step by Step Process ?"
Orifice plate sizing is an iterative process.
I start with the process data.
I select an initial differential pressure.
I calculate the orifice bore.
I check the beta ratio and permanent pressure loss.
If the result is not acceptable,
I change the selected DP and repeat the calculation.
Step 1: Collect the Input Data
I begin with the latest approved documents.
From the P&ID
I collect:
Flow instrument tag number
Line number
Nominal line size
Design pressure
Design temperature
Flow direction
Available straight-pipe length
From the Pipe Class Document
I collect:
Pipe schedule
Pipe material
Flange rating
Flange material
Actual pipe internal diameter
The actual pipe internal diameter is important.
I do not use only the nominal pipe size. Different pipe schedules have different internal diameters.
From the Process Datasheet
I collect:
Fluid name
Fluid phase
Minimum flow
Normal flow
Maximum flow
Operating pressure
Operating temperature
Density
Dynamic viscosity
Vapour pressure for liquids
Molecular weight for gases
Compressibility factor,
Specific heat ratio,
Allowable permanent pressure loss
Base pressure and temperature, if applicable
The fluid properties must correspond to the flowing conditions.
Step 2 : Select the Calibrated Flow Range
I establish the calibrated maximum flow.
A typical starting point is:
Q (Flow for Calculation) = 1.2 Times Q (Max flow by process)
β
This provides a 20% margin above the expected maximum flow.
However, the margin must follow the project specification. (If it is specially mentioned)
Step 3 : Check the Required Rangeability
I calculate the required rangeability:
β Rangeability = Max Flow / Min Flow
For example:
β Max Flow = 100 GPM
Min flow = 20 GPM
Rangeability = 100/20 = 5:1
A conventional orifice flowmeter normally performs best over a limited flow range.
above 4:1 or 5:1 the orifice rangeability is not good.
Due to sqaure root relationship.
Hence if higher rangeability then we might need 2 flow transmitters or a different flow technology.
Step 4 : Select the Orifice Standard
Then I confirm the applicable project standard for sizing.
Common standards include:
ISO 5167
ASME MFC-3M
AGA Report No. 3
The standard determines:
Orifice plate construction
Pressure tapping arrangement
Discharge coefficient
Beta-ratio limits
Reynolds-number limits
Straight-run requirements
Calculation uncertainty
The selected calculation method must match the actual installation.
Step 5 : Select the Initial Differential Pressure
I select an initial maximum DP.
A common starting value is:
2500 mmH2O (or 100 inH2O)
Other trial values may include:
1000 or 1250 mmHβO
2500 mmHβO
3000 mmHβO
5000 mmHβO
The initial value is only a starting point.
The final DP depends on:
Required flow range
Minimum-flow accuracy
Allowable pressure loss
Available process pressure
Calculated beta ratio
DP transmitter capability
Step 6. Calculate the Orifice Bore
I enter the process data into the approved sizing software.
The software calculates the required orifice bore.
The basic mass-flow equation is:
Mass flow equation
Where:
= mass flow
= discharge coefficient
= expansibility factor
= orifice bore area
= upstream fluid density
= differential pressure
= beta ratio
The orifice bore area is:
Orifice Bore area (Formula)
The beta ratio is:
beta ratio formula
Where:
d = orifice bore diameter
D = pipe internal diameter
The sizing software performs an iterative calculation.
This is necessary because depends on:
Beta ratio
Reynolds number
Pressure-tap arrangement
Applicable calculation standard
Step 7 : Check the Beta Ratio
After calculating the bore, I check the beta ratio:
Beta ratio Formula
For this sizing workflow, I use the following preferred range:
Beta Ratio Range
This is a practical project range.
Case A: Beta Ratio Is Acceptable
If:
0.2 < B(beta ratio) < 0.7
I continue to the permanent pressure-loss check.
Case B: Beta Ratio Is Greater Than 0.70
If:
B(beta ratio) > 0.7
the orifice bore is too large relative to the pipe diameter.
The generated DP signal may be too low.
My action
I increase the selected DP.
For example:
β From 2500 mmH2O to 3000 mmH2Oβ
A higher selected DP requires a smaller bore for the same flow.
Therefore:
Increase DP β Smaller Bore β Lower Beta Ratio
I then repeat the sizing calculation.
Case C: Beta Ratio Is Less Than 0.20
If:
B(beta ratio) < 0.2 β
The orifice bore is too small relative to the pipe diameter.
This may create:
High local velocity
High permanent pressure loss
Greater plugging risk
Erosion risk
Cavitation risk in liquid service
My action
I decrease the selected DP.
For example:
From 2500 mmH2O β 1000 mmH2O
A lower selected DP requires a larger bore for the same flow.
Therefore:
Lower DP β Larger Bore β Higher Beta
I then repeat the sizing calculation.
Step 8. Check the Permanent Pressure Loss
Once the beta ratio is acceptable, I check the permanent pressure loss.
The measured DP is not the same as permanent pressure loss.
Some pressure recovers downstream of the orifice plate. The unrecovered portion is the permanent pressure loss.
I compare the calculated permanent loss with the process allowable limit.
If the Permanant Pressure Loss Is Acceptable
I continue with the remaining sizing checks.
If the Pressure Loss Is Too High
I reduce the selected maximum DP.
A lower DP normally gives:
A larger orifice bore
A higher beta ratio
A lower permanent pressure loss
A weaker measurement signal
I then repeat the calculation.
The new beta ratio must also remain acceptable.
If the pressure-loss and beta requirements cannot both be met, I consider another solution.
Possible alternatives include:
Changing the meter-run diameter
Using a flow nozzle
Using a Venturi meter
Using a vortex flowmeter
Using an ultrasonic flowmeter
Using a Coriolis flowmeter
Step 9. Check the DP at Normal and Minimum Flow
I calculate the expected DP at different flow rates.
The relationship is
Formula
β
Example
Assume:
Maximum flow = 100 mΒ³/h
Normal flow = 70 mΒ³/h
Minimum flow = 20 mΒ³/h
Maximum DP = 2500 mmHβO
DP at normal flow
β
DP at minimum flow
β
β β β
I verify that the transmitter can accurately measure the minimum DP.
I check:
Transmitter calibrated span
Transmitter range limits
Reference accuracy
Zero stability
Static-pressure effect
Ambient-temperature effect
Impulse-line effects
Required flow uncertainty
Step 10. Check the Reynolds Number
I check the Reynolds number at:
Maximum flow
Normal flow
Minimum flow
The minimum flow is often the critical condition.
At low flow, Reynolds number decreases. The discharge coefficient may also change.
If Reynolds number falls outside the standardβs limits, the expected calculation accuracy may no longer apply.
A sizing result is not acceptable only because the beta ratio is correct.
The Reynolds number must also comply with the selected standard.
Step 11: Perform Fluid-Specific Checks
For Liquid Service
I check:
Vapour pressure
Upstream pressure
Downstream pressure
Vena-contracta pressure
Cavitation risk
Flashing risk
Erosion risk
The lowest pressure occurs near the vena contracta.
This pressure may be lower than the downstream tapping pressure.
If the local pressure approaches the liquid vapour pressure, cavitation or flashing may occur.
In that case, I consider reducing the selected DP.
For Gas and Steam Service
I check:
Upstream absolute pressure
Operating temperature
Fluid density
Compressibility factor
Isentropic exponent
Expansibility factor
DP-to-static-pressure ratio
Velocity or Mach number, when required
The expansibility factor corrects for the change in density through the restriction.
Step 12. Check the Installation Requirements
A correct bore does not guarantee accurate measurement.
The physical installation must also comply with the selected standard.
I check:
Upstream straight-pipe length
Downstream straight-pipe length
Elbow locations
Control-valve location
Reducer and expander locations
Thermowell location
Pressure-tap type
Pressure-tap orientation
Impulse-line routing
Plate orientation
Flow direction
Drain or vent requirements
If the available straight length is inadequate, I consider:
Relocating the meter
Installing a flow conditioner
Using a conditioning orifice
Selecting another meter technology
Step 13. Select the DP Transmitter
I select the DP transmitter after finalising the orifice DP.
The transmitter must cover:
Maximum calibrated DP
Expected operating DP
Startup conditions
Process overrange
Maximum static pressure
I avoid selecting an unnecessarily wide transmitter range.
An oversized range can reduce performance at low DP.
I also check:
Maximum working pressure
Static-pressure rating
Overpressure limit
Wetted-part material
Diaphragm material
Process connection
Manifold arrangement
Environmental protection
Hazardous-area certification
Quick Decision Guide
Beta is greater than 0.70
Action: Increase the DP.
Expected result:
Bore decreases
Beta decreases
Signal increases
Permanent pressure loss may increase
Beta is less than 0.20
Action: Decrease the DP.
Expected result:
Bore increases
Beta increases
Signal decreases
Permanent pressure loss normally decreases
Permanent pressure loss is too high
Action: Decrease the DP.
Then:
Recalculate the bore
Recheck beta
Recheck minimum-flow DP
Recheck transmitter performance
Minimum-flow DP is too low
Possible actions:
Increase the selected maximum DP
Use a lower DP transmitter range
Use two DP transmitters
Reduce the calibrated maximum flow
Select another flowmeter technology
Any increase in DP must be checked against the allowable permanent pressure loss.
Final Summary
I perform orifice sizing as a calculation loop.
I collect the process and piping data.
I establish the calibrated flow range.
I select an initial DP.
I calculate the orifice bore.
I check the beta ratio.
I check the permanent pressure loss.
I check the DP at minimum flow.
I check Reynolds number.
I check fluid-specific limits.
I check the installation.
I select the DP transmitter.
I repeat the calculation if any check fails.
The main DP adjustment rules are:
The final design must satisfy both objectives:
The DP signal must be large enough to measure.
The permanent pressure loss must remain acceptable with Process requirements.
#2- Engineering Question
For Orifice Flowmeter which tapping should i select for line size of 1/2 to 1 "
Option 1 :
Corner Taps
Flange Taps
Pipe Taps
Right Answer gets feature next week to 10,000 Engineers in the newsletter.
#3 -Career Tip
If you had to choose between.
The Passion to learn.
And IQ (or Smartness)
If woudl always choose Option 1.
If you have the Passion to learn you can outlearn and smart engineer.
I'm a youtuber and educator who loves to talk about Instrumentation and Control Engineering. Subscribe and join over 10,000+ newsletter readers every week!
Hey there, What if one intense 60-minute crash course on control valves could change your career forever? Let me share a story, That still gives me the insane energy to teach control valve technology despite my busy schedule and commitments. The Desperate Call On Saturday 30th August. An engineer called me in a panic. he'd aced his first interview round but fell flat on control valves. He didn't even know what a flange rating was. Let alone how to calculate it. Below is a picture of his...
Dear Future Control Valve Expert, Here's a 48 hour replay Of Control Valve Sizing Workshop [Day 1] Click Here to Watch the Replay Also below is the google drive link to download The Control Valve Selection Algorithm (S.P.E.C.S) discussed in the Workshop Above. Click here to download the Valve Selection Algorithm discussed in Webinar Day 2 Webinar If you have received this email, Just reply " Received Replay" so I know you have received. And then I can share the day 2 Workshop recording on the...
π " Three Times Better (Engineer) " The 3 Things You will learn today are as follows. β One Engineering Learning Why only Control Valve are less than Line Size and not On-Off valves. β One Engineering Question What will you do if control valve noise is 90 DBA. β One Career Tip from Top Professionals If you choose the difficult path then life becomes easy. Before we start, If you want to Master and perform "Live" Control Valve Sizing. Then on 27th and 28th June We are having a 2 day Valve...